One thing that I've noticed recently when I play golf is the number of 20-handicappers who'll say something along the lines of "this new ball that I'm using is adding at least 10 yards to my drives." I usually feign interest and say something patronizing like, "Wow, that's technology these days." They don't know it, but I'm rolling my eyes behind that enthusiastic veneer.
I blame the media. It's almost impossible to watch golf these days and not hear how the ball travels so much further than before. Some old-timers are even crying that the new balls are ruining the game.
One bitter old fart who's been harping on this topic is the former PGA Tour commissioner, Deane Beman. In a recent interview, Beman said, "I have a great deal of respect for the players today and what they can do. But many of them are being cheated out of really learning how to perfect their craft because of the technology they're playing with. If you put the old ball in front of them to play, it would be a massacre."
It sounds to me like he's yearning for the "good old days." People like this can't accept that today's golfers, and athletes in general, are much better as a whole than those in yesteryear.
I'm not saying that technology isn't a factor. I do think that the golf ball is eons better than before. However, I think that some of the things that the media is saying is misleading for the amateur golfer.
When the media says that the ball is longer than before, they mean specifically the ball that the pros use. As Paul Azinger acknowledged in a recent ABC telecast, the ball isn't necessarily traveling any farther now than before. For example, a Pinnacle distance ball from 5 years ago goes just as far, if not farther, as the latest Pro V1. The real difference is that the pros would never use a Pinnacle because it lacked spin.
There used to be a major tradeoff in ball performance between spin and distance. Since spin control is much more important to a pro than distance, high-spin wound balata balls were the norm on tour back in the day. While these balls felt like you were hitting a marshmallow, it went about as far as one too. If you wanted distance, you had to sacrifice spin and play with a two-piece solid core "rock."
However, with today's multilayer technology, ball manufacturers are able to produce balls that feel and spin like a wound balata, but travel the distance of a solid core ball. Therefore, the pros are able to achieve more distance without compromising spin control. On the other hand, most amateurs are accustomed to solid core distance balls. So when amateurs transition to the modern multilayer ball, they aren't gaining more distance. Rather, they're getting more spin control.
Unfortunately, it takes too much effort for me to explain all of this to every 20-handicapper who tells me that his ball is giving him "10 more yards." And who the heck am I to rain on anyone's parade?
P.S. Peter Kostis wrote an article on this very topic, "Stop Blaming the Ball!"
10 comments:
What most people don't stop to realize is you have around 14 drives per round, and around 40-50 irons shots which could benefit from a ball with better spin characteristics than the distance ball they play. Where is the greatest oportunity for stroke improvment? Do the math.
40-50 iron shots! Good God! Add in 28 putts or so and you're barely breaking par without the drives! :-P
Maybe by "old ball" Beman means a ball without dimples? I'm sure the pro's would love to "perfect their craft" with 75 yard drives.
As someone who has never cared nor found golf very interesting I have to say that this one simple post has turned that a bit around. While I am not likely to run out and grab some clubs, the science behind it is something interesting. Of course that is the geek in me that led me to lern how to brew beer and then get a job running a brewery...
Well, to us 50= handicappers spin is just some thign that happens like the weather and distance comes and goes
Well, to us 50= handicappers spin is just some thign that happens like the weather and distance comes and goes
Be the ball, Danny. Be the ball.
I think the biggest difference is
that the balls today fly higher and stright. It is's hard to make
the ball hook or fade on demand then with the old balls. No need to be a great shotmaker.
I don't think the old-time golfers with their old time equipment would stand a chance on todays tight and long courses. I'd say it's a wash -- golfers are the same today as before, no better and no worse. Oddly, courses have been adapted to the new equipment. (Or not so oddly, as there is tons of money to be made by continuously altering and improving the equipment -- though that has maxed-out about now, by the USGA clamping down.) But I would like to know where Tommy gets his Titelist balata 100 balls! My father used to play with those, 40+ years ago! "Hey Tommy, yo! Where did you say you buy those Titlist balata 100's?"
I know this is an old post, but the balls really do fly farther than before. The USGA's overall distance standard for carry and roll has increased several times since 1975 alone. It is now 315 yards, up from 305 just a few years back. Technology has allowed for higher swing speeds and more foregiveness also, however, we must remember, it took all of that to finally break the 60 year old scoring record on the TOUR.
Post a Comment